ADVERTISEMENT
image

Federal/Government

Pharmacists working in federal agencies serve in organizations such as the Veterans Administration, Department of War, Indian Health Service, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institutes of Health, and the U.S. Public Health Service. These roles include opportunities in clinical care, administration, policy, and research. They provide direct patient care, oversee medication safety, support public health initiatives, and shape health programs affecting populations nationwide. These careers offer competitive benefits, job stability, and the chance to impact health care delivery both at the individual and system-wide levels.

Meet the Pharmacist

Mrs. Catherine Avery
Chief of Clinical Pharmacist, Seattle Pharmacy Group

Mrs. Avery is a board-certified clinical pharmacist with over 28 years of experience in managing complex medication therapies. She is passionate about patient education and leveraging technology to improve health outcomes.
At Wellness Pharmacy Group, he leads a team of dedicated pharmacists committed to providing personalized care and expert advice.

Mr. John Doe, PharmaD
Lead Clinical Pharmacist, Wellness Pharmacy Group

Dr. Chen is a board-certified clinical pharmacist with over 12 years of experience in managing complex medication therapies. He is passionate about patient education and leveraging technology to improve health outcomes.
At Wellness Pharmacy Group, he leads a team of dedicated pharmacists committed to providing personalized care and expert advice.

Table of Contents

  • Background
  • Characteristics
  • Insider’s perspective
  • Most appealing aspects
  • Least appealing aspects
  • Advice
  • Critical factor ratings
  • Critical factors
  • References/resources
  • Professional organizations

Background

Pharmacists who work for a government pharmacy are employees of local, state, or federal government agencies. These could include government units such as municipal health clinics, departments of the health, state Medicaid agencies, federal Medicare agencies, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), branches of the U.S. military, including the Army, Navy, and Air Force, the U.S. Public Health Service (PHS), and other related organizations. The PHS oversees a number of agencies, including, but not limited to, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), the Federal Bureau of Prisons, the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), the Indian Health Service (IHS), and the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Federal/government pharmacists may be considered active military or have a civilian appointment depending on their place of employment and their position held.

Opportunities for pharmacists in the government are varied and cover a wide scope of practices including clinical, research, and administrative roles. This profile includes roles such as:

  • Medication management and therapeutic monitoring
  • Patient care and education
  • Collaborative practice and health care team integration
  • Public health and policy development
  • Pharmacy clinical operations and management
  • Strategic planning and leadership
  • Staff management
  • Operational oversight
  • Regulatory compliance
  • Medication safety
  • Budgetary management

Characteristics

A total of 104 federal pharmacists responded to the 2024–2025 APhA Career Pathways Program Survey. Thirty-seven percent of the respondents completed a residency. An additional 10.6% received an MPH, 6.73% received an MS or MBA, and 2.90% received an MHA degree. Five respondents indicated they completed more than one additional degree, and one received a JD degree.

Information provided indicated that pharmacists in this profile have an average age of 47 years. The average salary for a federal pharmacist varies based on experience, the government agency, and location but generally falls within a range of $116,000 to $181,000 annually. The average annual salary is $157,701.

The average time worked was the standard 40 hours per week; however, this varies per location–as an example, a pharmacist at a federal hospital may work 7 days on, and then 7 days off. The number of hours can also depend on the type of clinical position. A total of 32.7% indicated that they travel for work. Another 23.1% indicated that they work nights and weekends.

A total of 82 consultants responded directly to a question about what they felt was an important skill for their role. The roles mentioned with the highest percentages included: ability to adapt/learn (17.3%), communication (13.5%), and putting the patient first (8.65%). Many other critical factors were listed by the group.

One of the respondents from Florida stated, “Communication, leadership, problem solving, (being) bilingual.” Another from Virginia added, “To not only be knowledgeable but also confident and willing to stand up for what is right/best for the patient.” One additional respondent from Georgia commented, “Ability to take initiative, be flexible, and speak up.”

Insider’s perspective

Respondents listed the following critical factors as those being the most important to them. Please note that a factor can rank highly based on wanting the factor or wanting to avoid the factor. As an example, some may rank repetitive activities as a top factor as this is something that they want or look to avoid in their practice. The factors listed below are based on the number of respondents who indicated these would be the top five factors they would like to have in a role. Note that there are 25 total critical factors from which to select.

Top 5 – first tier

Three of the factors have the same rating.

  • Application of knowledge (clinical or scientific) (23.1%)
  • Community impact (19.2%)
  • Collaborating with health professionals (15.4%)
  • Problem solving (15.4%)
  • Leisure and family time (15.4%)

In addition to the top five factors, the second tier of critical factors are listed below. Note that three of the factors, community impact, problem solving, and collaborating with health professionals are listed in both areas. This can be interpreted to mean that, for some, these factors are in their top five list while, for others, these are a close second.

Top 5 – second tier

  • Problem solving (15.3%)
  • Collaborating with health professionals (14.4%)
  • Community impact (11.5%)
  • Innovative thinking (10.6%)
  • Compensation (9.62%)

One respondent from Maryland indicated that “Clinical and scientific knowledge is valued in my institution.” Another respondent from Arizonia stated, “My favorite is to dig into clinical scenarios and provide technical support.”

There are many rewarding and challenging experiences in being a pharmacist in federal and state government. Thirty-five percent of the respondents indicated helping patients was the most rewarding aspect of the role.” A respondent from Arizona stated, “The most rewarding experience is helping a veteran improve their particular disease state and health.” Another respondent from Georgia added, “Talking to a patient who is not satisfied with our services and changing their perspective of the services provided.”

There was no specific area highlighted as challenging as there are many. One of the pharmacists from Florida indicated, “A challenging aspect is reviewing data that is often incomplete.” Another from Alabama stated, “Time. Sometimes there just does not feel like enough hours in the day to complete tasks outside of patient care.”

Respondents were asked to select an additional factor from the full list that they consider to be the most important. Work schedule and job security were both listed the most often at 17.3%, followed by geographic work location flexibility and self-worth value both at 8.65%, then pressure/stress and multiple task handling each at 7.69%.

Federal/government pharmacists had a variety of responses that they provided as highlights of their career and where they see the future of the role. Several of the responses are listed below:

  • “Seeing near death patients recover as a result of great multi-disciplinary care.”
  • “Opportunities for more pharmacists to become part of the public health workforce and work in non-traditional roles.”
  • “Ask questions–see the profession as a springboard to advancing one's skills.”
  • “Seek opportunities to improve your community through a systems change point of view.”
  • “Learn all you can about how to lead a group of highly effective professionals.”
  • “Pharmacy opens endless opportunities. you can do a lot with the degree.”
  • “Always be curious.”

Most appealing aspects

What aspects of the role are most appealing?

A total of 14.4% of the respondents listed working with patients was the most appealing aspect of the role. Another 6.73% indicated leadership was an appealing aspect as well. One respondent from Oregon stated, “Leading an effort that significantly impacts and improves patient care for the population I specialize in.” Another from New York simply added, “Helping patients to achieve better outcomes.”

One pharmacist from the District of Columbia commented that they appreciate the “Opportunity to define and redefine the role of a pharmacist in the medical countermeasure arena, emergency preparedness and how it all works to address health inequities.”

Least appealing aspects

What aspects of the role are least appealing?

Twelve percent of the respondents indicated that the least appealing aspect is the administrative/managerial tasks that they are asked to complete. One respondent from Georgia stated, “Dealing with different staff members can sometimes be overwhelming.” Another from Maryland put this simply, “Managing poor performers.”

An additional 5.77% of the respondents highlighted bureaucracy as a concern. One respondent from Virginia stated, “Red tape in completing projects in government setting.”

Advice

What advice should student pharmacists and practitioners consider when selecting a federal/government pharmacist role?

Respondents provided advice across several areas. One specific trend came through that one needs to be passionate about their work, at 5.77%.

One respondent from Georgia indicated, “If it is your passion, go for it. If you truly love it, you will not be as happy doing anything else, even on the hard days.” Another from Minnesota stated, “Pick your passion and grow it”

Encouragement from several of the pharmacists is listed below:

  • “Learn all you can about how to lead a group of highly effective professionals.”
  • “Choose your path wisely and be resilient.”
  • “Provide the level of care that you would want your family member's PharmD to provide to them always, 100% of the time.”
  • “If you are interested in a field, go for it! Do not let the fear of being underqualified or underprepared stop you.”
  • “Time management, flexibility, and adaptability are key.”

Critical factor ratings

Opportunities for advancement
[To what degree does your work allow for advancement?]

Respondents rated the opportunities for advancement at a mid-range score of 7.22.

One respondent from Texas stated, “The opportunity to transition to the director position is somewhat predicated on willingness to relocate.” Another from Connecticut added, “I advanced 3 to 4 times since starting but am reaching a ceiling currently.”

One additional pharmacist from Maryland commented, “As a military officer, we have a large number of positions and promotions available to us.”

7.22
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0 = Little advancement opportunities 10 = Great opportunities for advancement

Leadership development/professional involvement
[To what extent does your work allow for the development of leadership skills and professional involvement in the pharmacy profession?]

Respondents rated this factor with a mid-range score of 7.86.

One respondent from California stated, “My work supported a yearlong leadership development program. It was multidisciplinary, multi-regional, and very informative.” Another from Washinton commented, “There are many trainings available year-round, including government hosted trainings (live in-person, live webinar, and recorded) as well as networking opportunities.”

Another pharmacist from New York added, “Strongly, strongly encourage others to pursue leadership opportunities with the commissioned corps.”

7.86
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0 = Little development of leadership skills and professional involvement 10 = Great opportunities for leadership development and professional involvement

Community impact
[How much impact does your work have in terms of serving the community?]

Respondents rated community impact in the high range with an 8.11.

One respondent from South Carolina stated, “I have the opportunity to make an impact on my patient’s health daily. The VA has community outreach and homeless veteran programs as well.” Another from Illinois put this simply, “the veteran community is very important.”

A pharmacist from Nebraska added, “Our services are the only ones available for our military community here in a foreign country.”

8.11
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0 = Little impact 10 = High level of impact

Autonomy
[To what extent does your work allow for autonomy in decision making?]

Pharmacists rated autonomy in the mid-range with a 7.84 rating.

A respondent from Washington indicated, “There is autonomy within your lane. There is also a hierarchy within government to follow.” Another from South Carolina provided a different look at this and stated, “I have full provider status; I work at the top of my licensure.”

An additional respondent from Florida added, “Direct patient care with advanced scope of practice.”

7.84
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0 = Very little low autonomy 10 = High level of autonomy

Focus
[To what extent does your work allow you to be focused on the future versus a focus only on immediate tasks?]

Focus was rated 6.86, which is a mid-range response.

One respondent from New York stated, “There is a healthy balance of both of these.” Another pharmacist from Georgia added, “Most days a certain load is expected, so daily tasks focus on immediate needs.”

A respondent from Maryland differentiates this by roles, “Leadership (is) afforded this allowance, not so much for staff.”

6.86
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0 = Immediate tasks only 10 = Tasks focused on the future

Prestige
[To what extent does your work provide professional prestige?]

Respondents rated prestige at 7.51, a mid-range response.

A pharmacist from Nebraska stated, “I feel valued in our multidisciplinary environment.” Another from Pennsylvania added, “Pharmacists are considered an invaluable part of the health care team and are respected for their contributions.”

7.51
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0 = Provides low prestige 10 = Provides high prestige

Creating value/positive outcomes
[To what extent does your work allow for personal fulfillment through the creation of value and positive outcomes?]

Pharmacists rated the ability to create value and impact positive outcomes in the upper range with a rating of 8.19.

A respondent from Colorado indicated, “My team creates positive outcomes for our patients on a daily basis.” Another respondent from the District of Columbia added, “Lots of autonomy and chances to lead on improvements which can lead to sense of accomplishment and ownership of those improvements.”

One additional pharmacist from Pennsylvania stated, “Positive measurable outcomes are consistent at our facility and in my practice, which gives me great personal fulfillment.”

8.19
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0 = Little extent 10 = High extent

Patient relationships
[To what degree do you have ongoing or long-term relationships with patients?]

Respondents scores were in the mid-range for patient relationships with a 4.67.

A pharmacist from Colorado stated, “Being in management, long-term relationships with patients are difficult.” A respondent from Arizona added, “We have a unique patient population that we often know by name.”

4.67
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0 = No ongoing/ long-term relationships 10 = All are long-term relationships

Coworker/client relationships
[To what degree do you have ongoing or long-term relationships with coworkers or clients?]

Respondents rated this factor as the second highest for the group at 8.29.

A respondent from California commented that they “have long-term relationships with various multidisciplinary committee members; however, turnover does affect the extent to which this occurs.” Another from Virginia stated, “As a supervisor, I work more with staff than patients.”

A respondent from Colorado added, “I have always had long-term relationships with coworkers, some going back over 40 years.”

8.29
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0 = No ongoing/ long-term relationships 10 = All are long-term relationships

Writing/conducting research
[How often do you engage in writing and/or conducting research?]

Respondents rated this factor in the mid-range with a score of 4.08.

A respondent from Tennessee stated, “Depends on whether you consider an investigation to be research. Sometimes, it certainly is but not necessarily scientific research.” Another from the District of Columbia indicated that they, “Spend a lot of time in writing documents, including clinical guidance, policy documents and development/improvement programming.”

Another pharmacist from Arizonia added, “Lots of writing for formulary items, reviews, performance improvement projects. Little research is done in health information systems.”

4.08
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0 = None of my time 10 = All my time

Generating new ideas
[To what degree does your work involve generating new ideas?]

Respondents rated generating new ideas a score of 7.02.

A respondent from Pennsylvania commented that they, “have a robust staff that meets frequently, and new ideas are encouraged.” Another from Nebraska indicated they use, “Innovative ways to delivering pharmaceutical care are highly supported by my superior.”

A pharmacist from Washington added, “Solving problems requires innovation.”

7.02
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0 = Little innovative thinking 10 = High degree of innovative thinking

Supervision/management
[To what extent do you spend your time organizing, managing, or supervising others and/or business operations?]

Respondents rated supervision/management as the lowest rated critical factor with a score of 3.54.

A respondent from Florida stated, “This work is highly independent.” This supports that lower rating of the factor. Another respondent provided a different perspective and added, “Everyone will find that they need to organize their work for the day or organize their thoughts for particularly challenging assignments.”

3.54
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0 = None of my time 10 = All my time

Patient interaction
[How much time do you spend interacting with patients?]

Respondents rated patient interaction at a mid-range score of 4.17.

A respondent from Connecticut stated: “More time is spent supervising and managing than interacting with patients.”

4.17
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0 = None of my time 10 = All my time

Public interaction
[How much time do you spend interacting with the public?]

Participants rated public interaction slightly lower than patient interaction with a rating of 3.58.

One respondent from Ohio defined this interaction in a unique way when they stated: “Public and patients are the same at the VA.”

3.58
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0 = None of my time 10 = All my time

Collaboration
[How often do you work or collaborate with other health professionals or educate other professionals in your work?]

Respondents rated collaboration in the high range with a score of 8.09.

One pharmacist from Oregon indicated, “I love the ability to collaborate and brainstorm ideas for how to improve care received by patients.” Another from Tennessee stated, “Part of the job is education, and I spend most of my time when I'm not filling out a form, doing that.”

A different pharmacist from Tennessee commented that they provide, “Education of pharmacists, nursing staff, physicians/medical residents, social workers, (and) psychologists.”

8.09
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0 = None of my time 10 = All my time

Family/leisure time
[How much free time do you have for leisure and family activities in your work?]

Respondents indicated a mid-range score of 6.21 for family/leisure time.

A pharmacist from the District of Columbia stated, “Earn 30 days of leave every year, very flexible leave structure.” Another from Arizona agrees and added, “Work/life balance is taken very seriously at my facility.”

One respondent from Colorado has a different view as they, “Donate many extra hours of time that could otherwise be spent on leisure and family time.”

6.21
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0 = Little free time 10 = Plenty of time for family and leisure activities

Impact on well-being
[To what degree do you impact the well-being of individuals?]

Pharmacists rated the impact they have on well-being in the upper mid-range with a score of 7.92.

A pharmacist from Maryland indicated, “We impact their access to the affordable care act and insurance coverage through Healthcare.gov.” Another from South Carolina stated, “You need to be a good problem solver to have impact for your patients.”

A respondent from Alabama provided a more detailed look and added, “The schedule itself goes hand-in-hand with stress/pressure and self-worth (in my opinion). Schedules that limit time off and time around holidays absolutely increases stress and can contribute to burn out and decrease in self-worth in regard to personal life versus work. Having a schedule where you actually have time away from work is so important.”

7.92
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0 = Low degree 10 = High degree

Problem solving
[To what degree do you solve problems with tried-and-true alternatives versus untested alternatives in your work?]

Respondents were mid-range at 5.74 regarding the use of tried-and-true solutions versus leveraging untested alternatives.

A respondent from Tennessee expressed some concern, “This role doesn't let you color outside the lines.” A pharmacist from Maryland provided a dilemma on this factor, “Innovation or suffocation.”

5.74
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0 = Tried and true 10 = Untested alternatives

Expertise
[How general or specialized is the expertise required in your work?]

Pharmacists rated the expertise critical factor with a score of 7.19, leaning toward the area of specialization.

A respondent from the District of Columbia stated, “Clinical HIV, supply chain coordination, and global partners are need to address the HIV epidemic.” A different respondent from the District of Columbia added their list, “Medical countermeasure, emergency preparedness and development of clinical practice guidelines for diseases where there is no approved treatment.”

A pharmacist from Maryland provided a unique perspective when they indicated, “Its specialized but preference for a law degree is helpful and law experience is valuable.”

7.19
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0 = Generalized 10 = Specialized

Repetition
[To what degree is your work composed of activities and tasks that are highly repetitive versus highly variable?]

Repetition was rated at a mid-range score of 6.00.

A respondent from Arizona indicated, “It is always different with patient workload, assignments, patient needs, staffing, precepting. One can never be bored.” Another from Pennsylvania supported this by stating, “Good mix at my workplace.”

A pharmacist from Tennessee added, “Inspections are highly repetitive, but the investigations are highly variable.”

6.00
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0 = Highly repetitive 10 = Highly variable

Applying scientific knowledge
[How much of your time is spent applying scientific knowledge in your work?]

Respondents were mid-range in applying scientific knowledge with a rating of 6.90.

A respondent from Maryland put this simply, “scientific application.” Another from Massachusetts added, “Ability to learn and apply new advancements in the field.” A different respondent from Maryland stated you need, “Technical knowledge that includes regulatory and scientific education.”

6.90
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0 = No application 10 = High level of application all the time

Applying clinical knowledge
[How much of your time is spent applying clinical knowledge in your work?]

Respondents indicated that they apply clinical knowledge to a higher degree than scientific knowledge with a rating of 7.25.

A respondent from Georgia stated, “Nice to use what was learned in school.” Another from Alabama added, “Important to me to utilize the information you learn and continue to learn after spending so many years of school to become a well-rounded provider.”

7.25
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0 = No application 10 = High level of application all the time

Parental leave
[To what extent does your work setting offer parental leave opportunities?]

Parental leave was rated a 6.77 by this group.

A respondent from Arizona stated, “We have formal maternity leave and paternity leave, but only sick time otherwise.” Another from South Carolina added, “VA has excellent leave for both moms and dads–top notch.”

6.77
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0 = Limited opportunities 10 = Unlimited opportunities

Compensation
[To what degree do you feel compensated for your responsibilities in your work?]

Compensation was rated in the mid-range at 7.47.

A respondent from Tennessee stated, “I believe I am well compensated for the work that I do even though I realize it requires a unique skill set to do this job.” Another from Colorado added, “Compensation would be adequate except for the extra time donated to perform all the required duties.”

A pharmacist from Arizona commented, “Government pay, good cost of living increases, extra pay for board certification.”

7.47
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0 = Not well compensated 10 = Well compensated

Benefit package
[How comprehensive is the employee benefit package offered in your work setting?]

The benefit package was the highest rated critical factor for this group with a score of 8.48.

A pharmacist from Tennessee indicated, “I have a retirement plus a 401K account, bonus for longevity, good health insurance and other paid benefits.” Another from Florida added, “Very flexible hours. Generous paid time off. Time and money allowances for continuing education. There is no cost for employee only medical benefits, life insurance, or long term disability.”

8.48
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0 = Not comprehensive 10 = Very Comprehensive

Advice for student pharmacists

Respondents provided advice across several areas and what the future brings. One specific trend came through, continued growth and expansion at 15.4%. Additional information from several pharmacists is listed below:

  • “Continued growth in the focus on patient care and movement away from simple provision of pharmaceuticals.”
  • “Increased pharmacist-led programs.”
  • “Taking on more responsibilities in care of patients.”
  • “Do it. It is very rewarding.”
  • “Be willing to make a difference and keep current and support professional associations for provider status.”
  • “Don't be afraid to take the difficult roles/jobs.”
  • “Self-evaluation for clinical vs administrative role.”
  • “Money is not everything. Do not pick a job just because of the pay. Pick an area of practice you enjoy and are passionate about.”

Critical factors

Opportunities for advancement 7.22
Leadership development/professional involvement 7.86
Community impact 8.11
Autonomy 7.84
Focus 6.86
Prestige 7.51
Creating value/positive outcomes 8.19
Patient relationships 4.67
Coworker/client relationships 8.29
Writing/conducting research 4.08
Generating new ideas 7.02
Supervision/management 3.54
Patient interaction 4.17
Public interaction 3.58
Collaboration 8.09
Family/leisure time 6.21
Impact on well-being 7.92
Problem solving 5.74
Expertise 7.19
Repetition 6.00
Applying scientific knowledge 6.90
Applying clinical knowledge 7.35
Parental leave 6.77
Compensation 7.47
Benefit package 8.48

References/resources

Schommer JC, Sogol EM, Brown LM. Work profile factors identified from the career pathway evaluation program, 2018 pharmacist profile survey. Am J Pharm.2019;83(10):7480.

Federal Pharmacist Salary. ZipRecruiter. Available at: www.ziprecruiter.com Accessed August 1, 2025.

Total salary range for United States Federal Government Pharmacist. Glassdoor. Available at: www.glassdoor.com Accessed August 1, 2025.

Professional organizations

Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy (AMCP)

675 North Washington Street, Suite 220, Alexandria, VA 22314
(703) 684-2600 | www.amcp.org

Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE)

190 South LaSalle Street, Suite 3000, Chicago, IL 60603-3446
(312) 664-3575 | www.acpe-accredit.org

American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy (AACP)

1400 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202
(703) 739-2330 | www.aacp.org

American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists (AAPS)

Avedisian Hall, 7 Greenhouse Road, Kingston, RI 02881
(703) 556-0650 | www.aaps.org

American Association of Psychiatric Pharmacists (AAPP)

8055 O Street, Suite S113, Lincoln, NE 68510
(402) 476-1677 | www.aapp.org

American College of Apothecaries (ACA)

2830 Summer Oaks Drive, Bartlett, TN 38134
(901) 383-8119 | www.acainfo.org

American College of Clinical Pharmacy (ACCP)

13000 West 87th Street Parkway, Lenexa, KS 66215-4530
(913) 492-3311 | www.accp.com

American Foundation for Pharmaceutical Education (AFPE)

11325 Random Hills Road, Suite 360A-105, Fairfax, VA 22030
(571) 404-0471 | www.afpenet.org

American Pharmacists Association (APhA)

2215 Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20037
(202) 628-4410 | www.pharmacist.com

American Society of Consultant Pharmacists (ASCP)

1240 North Pitt Street, Suite 300, Alexandria, VA 22314
(703) 739-1300 | www.ascp.com

American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP)

4500 East-West Highway, Suite 900, Bethesda, MD 20814
(866) 279-0681 | www.ashp.org

Board of Pharmacy Specialties (BPS)

2215 Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20037
(202) 946-5026 | www.bpsweb.org

Hematology/Oncology Pharmacy Association (HOPA)

555 East Wells Street, Suite 1100, Milwaukee, WI 53202
(877) 467-2791 | www.hoparx.org

National Alliance of State Pharmacy Associations (NASPA)

2530 Professional Road, North Chesterfield, VA 23235
(804) 285-4431 | www.naspa.us

National Association of Boards of Pharmacy (NABP)

1600 Feehanville Drive, Mount Prospect, IL 60056
(847) 391-4406 | www.nabp.pharmacy

National Association of Chain Drug Stores (NACDS)

1776 Wilson Blvd, Suite 200, Arlington, VA 22209
(703) 549-3001 | www.nacds.org

National Association of Specialty Pharmacy (NASP)

300 New Jersey Ave, NW, #900, Washington, DC 20001
(703) 842.0122 | www.naspnet.org

National Community Pharmacists Association (NCPA)

100 Daingerfield Road, Alexandria, VA 22314
(703) 683-8200 | www.ncpa.org

National Pharmaceutical Association (NPhA)

10810 North Tatum Boulevard, Suite 102-965, Phoenix, AZ 85028
(480) 405-9291 | www.nationalpharmaceuticalassociation.org

Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA)

670 Maine Avenue, SW, Suite 1000, Washington, DC 20024
(202) 835-3400 | www.phrma.org

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
ADVERTISEMENT