Insider’s perspective
Respondents listed the following critical factors as those being the most important to them. Please note
that a factor can rank highly based on wanting the factor or wanting to avoid the factor. As an example,
some may rank repetitive activities as a top factor as this is something that they want or look to avoid
in their practice. The factors listed below are based on the number of respondents who indicated these
would be the top five factors they would like to have in a role. Note that there are 25 total critical
factors from which to select. Please note that a couple of the factors have similar percentages.
Top 5 – first tier
Of interest are the two areas that were rated the same across the group.
- Collaborating with health professionals (27.6%)
- Application of knowledge (e.g., clinical or scientific) (19.7%)
- Leisure and family time (11.8%)
- Compensation (13.2%)
- Ongoing coworker/client relationships (13.2%)
In addition to the top 5 factors, the second tier of critical factors are listed below. Note that four
of the factors, application of knowledge (e.g., clinical or scientific), ongoing coworker/client
relationships, compensation, and leisure and family time are also listed in the top 5 first tier.
Top 5 – second tier
- Application of knowledge (e.g., clinical or scientific) (22.4%)
- Ongoing coworker/client relationships (13.3%)
- Compensation (15.8%)
- Leisure and family time (11.8%)
- Problem solving (10.5%)
One respondent from Georgia indicated that, “Having a great team really makes the most difference with
morale and mental health.” A different respondent from Georgia looked at their ongoing collaborations
and added, “Always discussing orders and administration with nurses or physicians.” Another from
Minnesota supported this statement by adding, “I enjoy working with other health professionals to solve
drug related problems.”
Another pharmacist from Indiana stated, “I work 7 on/7 off and I love this schedule which allows me to
have a life besides pharmacy but still be immersed in work during the time I work.” One respondent from
California added, “Pharmacists are well compensated for their dedication to patient care and their many
years of education required to be a part of this field of health care.”
There are many rewarding and challenging experiences in being a staff pharmacist in a health system
setting. Sixteen percent of the respondents indicated that working with patients was a rewarding
experience. Twelve percent of the respondents indicated that another rewarding aspect is being part of
the overall team of pharmacists, nurses, and physicians. One challenging area was listed by 9.2% of the
respondents—keeping up with new advances and interventions. Numerous other areas were highlighted by the
respondents.
A respondent from New Jersey stated it is “So rewarding to see a discharge home for a long-stay neonatal
intensive care unit (NICU) admission. Hoping for the best outcomes, it is rewarding when a NICU graduate
returns for a visit with their family.” Another respondent from Minnesota added it is rewarding,
“Feeling like an important part of the hospital team.” Supporting these statements was a respondent from
Illinois who indicated, “Rewarding–mutual respect of other health care providers.”
A couple of additional rewarding and challenging statements from respondents include one from
California, “Rewarding–that you have saved or improved a life. Challenging–staffing levels, sick calls
affecting your day-to-day assignments.” A respondent from Wisconsin stated, “The most rewarding
experiences are patient interactions through counseling on new oral chemotherapy medications. The most
challenging experience is coordinating inpatient chemotherapy with the interprofessional health care
team.”
A couple of additional rewarding and challenging statements from respondents include one from the North
Carolina, “Most rewarding would be seeing the improvement in patient functional status. Most challenging
is optimizing therapies in patients with low health literacy or limited access to care.”
Twenty-three percent indicated that work schedule is an additional factor that is important to them. In
addition, the following factors were also listed as important factors to consider: pressure/stress
(15.8%), self-worth/value (10.5%), and job security and geographic work location flexibility both at
6.58%.
The staff pharmacists that work in health system settings listed a variety of responses that they
consider highlights of their career and where they see the future of the role. Several of the responses
are listed below:
- “Patients and families calling back personally to thank me.”
- “Helping new pharmacists succeed and thrive.”
- “Serving as president of the Connecticut Pharmacists Association.”
- “Earning the mutual respect of other healthcare professionals in settings where the pharmacist
historically did not challenge or otherwise interact with others.”
- “Artificial intelligence will play a pivotal role in improving efficiency in the practice of
hospital pharmacy.”
- “Increased autonomy and clinical decision making.”
- “I see hospital staff leaning on the pharmacy even more as patients continue to have more chronic
health problems.”
Critical factor ratings
Opportunities for advancement
[To what degree does your work allow for advancement?]
Respondents rated the opportunities for advancement in the mid-range with a score of 5.00.
One respondent from Wisconsin indicated that, “There are a limited number of oncology pharmacist
coordinator roles available in our health system. There are many opportunities to move laterally (e.g.,
training in a clinic, inpatient, and investigational role).” Another respondent from Georgia stated,
“Only current opportunity for advancement is entering management.”
A different pharmacist from Georgia provided the following, “I will be promoted to manager soon and our
director position has been open twice. They like to choose internal applicants.” A pharmacist from
Minnesota added, “I work at a small hospital pharmacy, so besides becoming the director there is little
opportunity for advancement.”
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
0 = Little advancement opportunities
10 = Great opportunities for advancement
Leadership development/professional involvement
[To what extent does your work allow for the development of leadership skills and
professional involvement in the pharmacy profession?]
Respondents rated this factor in the mid-range with a of 5.51.
One staff pharmacist from Georgia indicated, “Being a pharmacist alone automatically puts one in a
position of leadership. Every day I am using my leadership skills to bring our team together and I read
a lot of books on leadership to grow and learn. To be a leader is to always be a student.” Another from
Minnesota added, “I am encouraged to be involved in multidisciplinary workgroups/committees in my
organization. My organization values pharmacy input.”
A respondent from Massachusetts had a different perspective when they stated, “The organization is
currently concentrating on pharmacy residents and technicians. Leadership development and formal
professional development are a low priorities for the staff pharmacists.” A different pharmacist from
Massachusetts supported this view and indicated there is, “Nothing available for leadership skills,
professional growth with medication information. Pharmacy is not a priority for the institution, and no
one is lobbying. Pharmacy always has a lean crew, with no time to fully commit to an impactful project.”
Finally, a staff pharmacist from Illinois provided a broader approach to the statement, “most roles
allow for ‘leadership’ opportunities if you do not equate leadership with advancement or titles.
Leadership is much broader and includes working independently, being proactive with ideas, formulary
suggestions, and inter- (as well as) intra-departmental relationships.”
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
0 = Little development of leadership skills and professional involvement
10 = Great opportunities for leadership development and professional
involvement
Community impact
[How much impact does your work have in terms of serving the community?]
Respondents rated community impact the highest factor for the group at 7.06, a mid-range rating.
One respondent from Indiana felt that they were in a group that has a high level of impact when they
explained, “High impact but only to the extent the patients served must have been in the hospital. This
is a trauma level one hospital, and we get traumas from all over the area and as a pediatric hospital,
we have intensive care for neonates and pediatrics as specialty areas.” Another respondent from
Massachusetts felt that their institution also has community impact when they stated, “We serve a
vulnerable community. The hospital is needed.”
Aa staff pharmacist from California indicated, “It is hard to see the benefits in the community from my
position. We always try to look out for what is best for the patient, but it is really hard to observe
the direct impact.” Another respondent from Alabama supported this thought when they added, “I serve
vulnerable populations, but I have limited direct patient care opportunities in my role.”
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
0 = Little impact
10 = High level of impact
Autonomy
[To what extent does your work allow for autonomy in decision making?]
Respondents rated autonomy in the mid-range with a score of 6.26.
One pharmacist from Georgia stated, “We have a very strict formulary and many processes in place that
must be followed.” Another respondent from New Jersey agreed with this thought and added, “We work
within protocols and order sets already built into our electronic medical record (EMR), Epic. Going
outside of that is not encouraged.”
A different respondent from Georgia had a different perspective and indicated, “My current manager
allows much autonomy as long as the patient is the priority.” Another pharmacist from Virginia stated,
“I currently have a great deal of flexibility in how my time is spent.”
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
0 = Very little low autonomy
10 = High level of autonomy
Focus
[To what extent does your work allow you to be focused on the future versus a focus only on
immediate tasks?]
Health system staff pharmacists lean toward immediate tasks compared to being focused on the future with
a factor rating of 4.25.
One respondent from New Jersey put it simply, “It is a very busy hospital. Trying to be available for
other causes is an obstacle to getting things done.” Another from Massachusetts added, “We are more
reactive than proactive.”
A respondent from Georgia looked at the possibility of future focus and stated, “We may look at future
changes during meetings, but on a day-to-day basis, we focus mostly on patients.” Another from New York
indicated, “We are so short staffed that it is hard to look past the current moment. The future is
usually not discussed because the issues of the immediate moment are much more urgent to deal with.”
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
0 = Immediate tasks only
10 = Tasks focused on the future
Prestige
[To what extent does your work provide professional prestige?]
Health system staff pharmacists rated prestige with a mid-range score of 5.25.
One pharmacist from New Jersey felt positive about their prestige and stated, “I feel our institution
holds high prestige, my work in the institution is vital and appreciated. Feels like a high prestige
position.” A different respondent from New Jersey indicated, “There’s a certain amount of mutual respect
amongst other professions within the community.”
One the other side of this, a respondent from Washington provided the following, “Outside the workplace,
pharmacy is well-regarded; not so much within this workplace.” Another respondent from Georgia added,
“In my work environment, coworkers generally have a lot of respect for our role in the healthcare team
but outside of the hospital I do not sense an element of prestige to a great degree.”
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
0 = Provides low prestige
10 = Provides high prestige
Creating value/positive outcomes
[To what extent does your work allow for personal fulfillment through the creation of value
and positive outcomes?]
Respondents rated this factor with a score of 6.15, leaning toward a higher level of creating
value/positive outcomes.
A health system pharmacist from California stated, “I feel personally fulfilled and value of positive
outcomes when we are able to save lives. Internally, I know that I can make a difference on a daily
basis.” A different pharmacist from California added, “Some interactions with MDs/psychologists are
great and they're so thankful to have us watching out for them.”
Another respondent from New Jersey stated, “I wish I had more time for personal fulfillment.”
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
0 = Little extent
10 = High extent
Patient relationships
[To what degree do you have ongoing or long-term relationships with
patients?]
Health system staff pharmacists rated patient relationships in the low range at 2.03. This makes sense
based on the role that some have is not patient facing or long-term.
One respondent from Georgia stated, “I hardly ever see a patient face-to-face.” Another from California
added I work with, “Psychiatric patients, so no long-term relationships other than if they are here for
a long time and remain on the same unit.”
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
0 = No ongoing/ long-term relationships
10 = All are long-term relationships
Coworker/client relationships
[To what degree do you have ongoing or long-term relationships with coworkers or
clients?]
Respondents rated the relationship with coworkers and clients in the mid-range at 6.08.
A respondent from Indiana stated, “I know no patients since I work in a hospital pharmacy department.
However, I have a good working relationship with my coworkers and would call some of the pharmacists I
work with good friends.” This was supported by another respondent from Georgia who added, “My coworkers
and I will attend each other’s weddings and host baby showers for each other.”
A different pharmacist from Georgia indicated, “We have an excellent coworker environment (pharmacy
staff, nurses, doctors, etc.).”
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
0 = No ongoing/ long-term relationships
10 = All are long-term relationships
Writing/conducting research
[How often do you engage in writing and/or conducting research?]
Respondents rated writing/conducting research as the lowest rated critical factor for the group with a
score of 1.35.
One respondent from New Jersey stated, “I spend almost no time writing. I write a nightly summary of the
daily issues for the overnight crew. It is usually brief and repetitive.” One other pharmacist from
California indicated, “Unfortunately, I have not been very involved in research in my current role. I
believe that it is important to write and share information, but I have yet to do much in my career.”
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
0 = None of my time
10 = All my time
Generating new ideas
[To what degree does your work involve generating new ideas?]
Respondents rated the generation of new ideas in the low mid-range with a rating of 4.09.
One staff pharmacist from Connecticut stated, “I constantly bombard my supervisor with ideas for
motivating the staff, streamlining some of our processes or solving supply problems. I would not say I
am very successful in any of these areas.” Another from Minnesota added, “Pharmacy staff is encouraged
to share new ideas.”
Another respondent from California indicated that, “Technology is so old we have had to come up with
creative work-a-rounds.”
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
0 = Little innovative thinking
10 = High degree of innovative thinking
Supervision/management
[To what extent do you spend your time organizing, managing, or supervising others and/or
business operations?]
Respondents rated this factor in the low mid-range with a score of 4.34.
One staff pharmacist from California indicated, “As a lead pharmacist, I am always supervising the work
of technicians, student pharmacists and interns. I provide operational guidance on a daily basis. We
often need to provide instructions on what to do for drug shortages.” A different pharmacist from
California added, “Pharmacy technicians and daily workflow.”
One respondent from Indiana stated, “I am not a manager, and there are multiple managers in my
department, so most managing is done by them. However, during the evening and night shifts, there are
often staffing issues. I have to take on that responsibility to find replacement staff to cover a shift.
This usually happens once or twice a week.”
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
0 = None of my time
10 = All my time
Patient interaction
[How much time do you spend interacting with patients?]
Patient interaction is rated in the low range with a score of 2.69.
One respondent from Indiana provided the following, “My time is spent with nurses and doctors, none with
patients directly.” Another from New Jersey added, “We do not have a practice that includes counseling
patients or caregivers at this time.”
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
0 = None of my time
10 = All my time
Public interaction
[How much time do you spend interacting with the public?]
Public interaction is one of the lowest rated factors with a score of 1.74.
A respondent from New York indicated, “(Most of my) interactions are with professional staff at
facilities.” Another respondent from California added, “I usually staff in the inpatient pharmacy so
it's behind locked doors and away from the public view.”
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
0 = None of my time
10 = All my time
Collaboration
[How often do you work or collaborate with other health professionals or educate other
professionals in your work?]
Health system pharmacists indicated collaborating with other health care professions received a
mid-range rating of 6.20.
One respondent from California stated, “I speak to health care providers throughout the day. Most of the
time it is to talk about the formulary selections or drug dosing recommendations. Antibiotic stewardship
is a common area for education.” Another respondent from New Jersey added, “At my institution, that is
more the clinical pharmacist's domain. I will answer questions at the window and then defer often.”
Another respondent from Connecticut indicated, “Once in a while a nurse, physician assistant, doctor
will call and ask for help with dosing or choosing a medication.”
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
0 = None of my time
10 = All my time
Family/leisure time
[How much free time do you have for leisure and family activities in your work?]
Family and leisure time was rated with a mid-range score of 6.00.
A staff pharmacist from California indicated, “It is really hard to get time off for leisure or family
activities. You miss a lot of special events because the hospital is open 24/7. I usually have to work
on major holidays.” Another respondent from Virginia was concerned that the “Job is very stressful and
weird hours. I wish I had more leisure time.”
A different respondent from California provided a unique perspective when they stated, “Some of us have
alternate work schedules (i.e., four 10-hour shifts in a row) and a day off during the week with no
nights and no weekends (on-call pharmacist).”
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
0 = Little free time
10 = Plenty of time for family and leisure activities
Impact on well-being
[To what degree do you impact the well-being of individuals?]
Health system staff pharmacists rated impact on well-being as the second highest critical factor with a
score of 6.95.
One respondent from California stated, “I make an effort to try to improve the well-being of others in
my department and patients which are served at my facility. I hope that I am making an impact, but I'm
not really sure.” Another respondent from Virginia added, “I think I really help others feel better and
make interventions that improve health.”
Another respondent from New Jersey indicated that, “I have an impact on my technician's well-being, they
have influence over mine.”
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
0 = Low degree
10 = High degree
Problem solving
[To what degree do you solve problems with tried-and-true alternatives versus untested
alternatives in your work?]
Respondents rated problem solving as a low mid-range factor at 4.49.
One pharmacist from Virginia stated, “If the tried-and-true methods work that's great but if they do
not, we try untested alternatives.” Another respondent from Virginia supported this by adding, “Most
things are evidence based but some have to be creative.”
Another respondent from New Jersey was blunt in their response when they said, “Untested alternatives
sound scary to me.”
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
0 = Tried and true
10 = Untested alternatives
Expertise
[How general or specialized is the expertise required in your work?]
Respondents were again in the low mid-range when looking at the expertise they provide with a rating of
4.65.
One respondent from California stated, “I believe the work is fairly generalized. There are a few areas
like critical care that are a specialty but in general, inpatient does not require a high degree of
expertise.” Another respondent from Minnesota added, “As a pharmacist in a small community hospital, you
deal with a wide variety of patients and drug-related problems. I enjoy learning something new nearly
every day.”
A different viewpoint was presented by a pharmacist from New Jersey who works in the NICU when they
indicated, “NICU pharmacy experience is specialized.”
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
0 = Generalized
10 = Specialized
Repetition
[To what degree is your work composed of activities and tasks that are highly repetitive
versus highly variable?]
Respondents react differently to this factor as some like repetition and others do not. Overall, the
respondents rated this factor at 4.20, which is a low mid-range response leaning to the role being more
repetitive.
A respondent from New Jersey stated, “There is much comfort in repetition for me.” Another from
California supported this when they added, “A LOT of the work is highly repetitive.”
A different pharmacist from California had a slightly different perspective and indicated, “Some tasks
are repetitive, but every day is different because each day the patient census changes. The concepts are
similar, but each patient case is unique.”
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
0 = Highly repetitive
10 = Highly variable
Applying scientific knowledge
[How much of your time is spent applying scientific knowledge in your
work?]
Respondents rated the application of scientific knowledge at 4.67, which is a lower mid-range rating.
One pharmacist from New Jersey stated, “Scientific knowledge, like the chemistry of parenteral nutrition
admixtures is relevant. Clinical knowledge, like how studies were conducted, how a medication was given
in the relevant study, which can come up every day.”
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
0 = No application
10 = High level of application all the time
Applying clinical knowledge
[How much of your time is spent applying clinical knowledge in your
work?]
Respondents rated the application of clinical knowledge at 6.92, which is much higher than the
application of scientific knowledge.
One respondent from California indicated that, “Inpatient pharmacy requires critical thinking and
clinical rationalization continuously. The science that we learn is school is a foundational key to
success.”
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
0 = No application
10 = High level of application all the time
Parental leave
[To what extent does your work setting offer parental leave opportunities?]
Respondents rated parental leave at the mid-range with a score of 5.16. One must take into consideration
that not all staff pharmacists have a need to leverage the benefit.
One respondent from Virginia stated, “I got 12 weeks of unpaid leave through FMLA, but I opted to use 8
weeks of short-term-disability benefits that were allowed to be for a c-section. Through short-term
disability, I received less than half of what my usual pay is for those 8 weeks.” Another pharmacist
from California added, “Baby bonding is available for both parents based on CA state laws.”
Another respondent from New Mexico indicated, “FMLA available but need to have earned leave to get
paid.” A pharmacist from Virginia who works at an institution with a different policy stated, “No
maternity or parental leave. Only FMLA and disability.”
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
0 = Limited opportunities
10 = Unlimited opportunities
Compensation
[To what degree do you feel compensated for your responsibilities in your work?]
Respondents listed compensation as in the mid-range with a rating of 6.49.
A pharmacist from Virginia stated, “Compensation could be better given high level of expertise, but we
are publicly funded.” Another respondent from California added, “Sometimes, there is no price that can
match the wear and tear on the body, mind and soul. But in general, I do believe that pharmacists are
well compensated.”
A different pharmacist from Virginia looked at this differently and indicated that they feel the
“Compensation is fine, need more staffing.”
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
0 = Not well compensated
10 = Well compensated
Benefit package
[How comprehensive is the employee benefit package offered in your work setting?]
Respondents feel that the benefit package they receive is somewhat comprehensive with a mid-range rating
of 6.56.
A respondent from California stated, “Medical, dental, vision and prescription drug coverage. There are
also employee discounts for various companies.” Another respondent from Georgia added, “PTO, health
insurance, 401k match, employee stock discount, student loan money, infertility coverage.”
A respondent from New Jersey indicated, “There are a lot of benefits, though there is a cost associated
with them. There was a recent wellness program (nutrition and lifestyle goals) that was of no cost to
us. It was useful and comprehensive.”
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
0 = Not comprehensive
10 = Very Comprehensive
Advice for students
Respondents provided advice across several areas and what the future brings. An increase in
responsibilities was listed by 9.21% of the staff pharmacists. Information from several of the
pharmacists is listed below:
- “Continuing to learn, gain experience, and grow. I hope to be in an even more clinical role in the
future. I’m also a preceptor, so just having students in the future.”
- “More clinical involvement and collaboration.”
- “Payment for clinical pharmacist services.”
- “More responsibility.”
- “Improved technology, increased volume, more individualized medicine choices.”
- “I see a more active role in pharmacists meeting patients face to face.”
Professional organizations
Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy (AMCP)
675 North Washington Street, Suite 220, Alexandria, VA 22314
(703) 684-2600 | www.amcp.org
Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE)
190 South LaSalle Street, Suite 3000, Chicago, IL 60603-3446
(312) 664-3575 | www.acpe-accredit.org
American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy (AACP)
1400 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202
(703) 739-2330 | www.aacp.org
American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists (AAPS)
Avedisian Hall, 7 Greenhouse Road, Kingston, RI 02881
(703) 556-0650 | www.aaps.org
American Association of Psychiatric Pharmacists (AAPP)
8055 O Street, Suite S113, Lincoln, NE 68510
(402) 476-1677 | www.aapp.org
American College of Apothecaries (ACA)
2830 Summer Oaks Drive, Bartlett, TN 38134
(901) 383-8119 | www.acainfo.org
American College of Clinical Pharmacy (ACCP)
13000 West 87th Street Parkway, Lenexa, KS 66215-4530
(913) 492-3311 | www.accp.com
American Foundation for Pharmaceutical Education (AFPE)
11325 Random Hills Road, Suite 360A-105, Fairfax, VA 22030
(571) 404-0471 | www.afpenet.org
American Pharmacists Association (APhA)
2215 Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20037
(202) 628-4410 | www.pharmacist.com
American Society of Consultant Pharmacists (ASCP)
1240 North Pitt Street, Suite 300, Alexandria, VA 22314
(703) 739-1300 | www.ascp.com
American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP)
4500 East-West Highway, Suite 900, Bethesda, MD 20814
(866) 279-0681 | www.ashp.org
Board of Pharmacy Specialties (BPS)
2215 Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20037
(202) 946-5026 | www.bpsweb.org
Hematology/Oncology Pharmacy Association (HOPA)
555 East Wells Street, Suite 1100, Milwaukee, WI 53202
(877) 467-2791 | www.hoparx.org
National Alliance of State Pharmacy Associations (NASPA)
2530 Professional Road, North Chesterfield, VA 23235
(804) 285-4431 | www.naspa.us
National Association of Boards of Pharmacy (NABP)
1600 Feehanville Drive, Mount Prospect, IL 60056
(847) 391-4406 | www.nabp.pharmacy
National Association of Chain Drug Stores (NACDS)
1776 Wilson Blvd, Suite 200, Arlington, VA 22209
(703) 549-3001 | www.nacds.org
National Association of Specialty Pharmacy (NASP)
300 New Jersey Ave, NW, #900, Washington, DC 20001
(703) 842.0122 | www.naspnet.org
National Community Pharmacists Association (NCPA)
100 Daingerfield Road, Alexandria, VA 22314
(703) 683-8200 | www.ncpa.org
National Pharmaceutical Association (NPhA)
10810 North Tatum Boulevard, Suite 102-965, Phoenix, AZ 85028
(480) 405-9291 | www.nationalpharmaceuticalassociation.org
Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA)
670 Maine Avenue, SW, Suite 1000, Washington, DC 20024
(202) 835-3400 | www.phrma.org