ADVERTISEMENT
image

Pharmaceutical Industry

Pharmacists in the pharmaceutical and biotech sectors apply their scientific and clinical expertise in various roles, including research and development, medical affairs, regulatory policy, medical science liaison work, and commercial functions. These careers highlight communication, leadership, and flexibility while offering opportunities to contribute to drug discovery, product safety, education, and patient access globally. Industry positions offer strong prospects for advancement, professional growth, and the chance to influence health care beyond individual patient interactions.

Meet the Pharmacist

Mrs. Catherine Avery
Chief of Clinical Pharmacist, Seattle Pharmacy Group

Mrs. Avery is a board-certified clinical pharmacist with over 28 years of experience in managing complex medication therapies. She is passionate about patient education and leveraging technology to improve health outcomes.
At Wellness Pharmacy Group, he leads a team of dedicated pharmacists committed to providing personalized care and expert advice.

Mr. John Doe, PharmaD
Lead Clinical Pharmacist, Wellness Pharmacy Group

Dr. Chen is a board-certified clinical pharmacist with over 12 years of experience in managing complex medication therapies. He is passionate about patient education and leveraging technology to improve health outcomes.
At Wellness Pharmacy Group, he leads a team of dedicated pharmacists committed to providing personalized care and expert advice.

Table of Contents

  • Background
  • Characteristics
  • Insider’s perspective
  • Most appealing aspects
  • Least appealing aspects
  • Advice
  • Critical factor ratings
  • Critical factors
  • References/resources
  • Professional organizations

Background

There are many diverse opportunities for pharmacists in the pharmaceutical and biotech industry, leveraging their scientific and clinical knowledge. Roles can be found in corporate affairs, research and development, biomedical researchers, medical information, medical science liaisons, regulatory affairs, and various commercial areas. A strong background in biomedical sciences, research, pharmacology, and clinical practice, combined with advanced degrees or specialized training (residencies, fellowships), can be highly beneficial.

Many leverage key competencies including:

  • Scientific and clinical knowledge
  • Communication skills
  • Analytical skills
  • Interpersonal skills
  • Adaptability
  • Learning agility

This profile highlights information related to any role held by respondents across the pharmaceutical industry.

Characteristics

A total of 95 pharmaceutical industry pharmacists responded to the 2024–2025 APhA Career Pathways Program Survey. A total of 23.0% of the respondents completed a fellowship with 17.7% of the respondents completing a residency. An additional 7.29% received an MBA, 7.29% received an MS, 7.29% received a PhD, 2.08% received an MHA, 2.08% received an MPH, and two respondents have a JD degree.

Information provided indicated that pharmacists in this profile have an average age of 44 years old. The average salary across all roles in the industry is $137,480. Total pay can included bonuses and profit sharing depending on the specific position and the company. Entry-level positions in the pharmaceutical industry may start lower, with salaries increasing with experience and senior roles. Location of the role can also impact the overall salary. Salaries may be higher based on the size and type of company.

The average time worked was listed between 40 and 44 hours per week. The number of hours can depend on the specific type of position, department, and size of the organization. Fifty-three percent indicated that they travel for work. Another 27.1% indicated that they work nights and weekends.

A total of 82 pharmacists responded directly to a question about what they felt was an important skill for their role. The group provided numerous responses to the open-ended question regarding the most important skill in their current role. Two skills stood out the most: communication (16.7%) and leadership (15.21%).

Insider’s perspective

Respondents listed the following critical factors as those being the most important to them. Please note that a factor can rank highly based on wanting the factor or wanting to avoid the factor. As an example, some may rank repetitive activities as a top factor as this is something that they want or look to avoid in their practice. The factors listed below are based on the number of respondents who indicated these would be the top five factors they would like to have in a role. Note that there are 25 total critical factors from which to select.

Top 5 – first tier

Two of top tier critical factors have the same percentage.

  • Leisure and family time (18.8%)
  • Work type (e.g., repetitive versus variable work) (12.5%)
  • Application of knowledge (clinical or scientific) (12.5%)
  • Autonomy (11.5%)
  • Problem solving (8.33%)

In addition to the top 5 factors, the second tier of critical factors is listed below. Note that one of the factors; problem solving is listed in both areas.

Top 5 – second tier

  • Innovative thinking (14.6%)
  • Collaborating with health professionals (12.5%)
  • Problem solving (11.5%)
  • Compensation (10.4%)
  • Community impact (8.33%)

Regarding leisure and family time, a respondent from North Carolina indicated, “Work-life balance is most important to prevent burnout and continue to bring a feeling of value within an organization.”

There are many rewarding and challenging experiences with being a pharmacist in the pharmaceutical industry. Seven percent of the respondents indicated that a rewarding aspect is the launch of a new product. Numerous other areas were highlighted by the respondents.

A respondent from Florida stated, “Rewarding–knowing that I am helping tens of thousands of patients with the work that I do. Challenging–overcoming the implicit bias that professionals have for industry employees.” Another respondent from Maryland added, “Rewarding–finding answers to research questions. Challenging–getting others to trust your opinions.”

A couple of additional rewarding statements from respondents include one from North Carolina, “I have helped bring some important medicines to patients. I currently help assure their safety in the operating room and other surgical procedures.”

Fifteen percent indicated that geographic work location, self-worth/value, and work schedule as additional factors that are important to them. In addition, 8.33% listed pressure/stress and 7.30% listed job security.

Fifteen percent indicated that geographic work location, flexibility, and work schedule as additional factors that are important to them. In addition, 12.1% listed self-worth/value and 9.01% listed pressure/stress.

Pharmacists in the pharmaceutical industry had a variety of responses that they provided as highlights of their career and where they see the future of the role. Several of the responses are listed below:

  • "Inpatient internal medicine is constantly changing but I think there will continue to be great opportunities for clinical pharmacists.”
  • “Presenting at national meetings to help others.”
  • “Seeing former students/residents complete training and become colleagues and go on to have amazing careers.”
  • “Helping bring new transformative treatments to millions of people around the world for diabetes/obesity.”
  • “The ability to make a difference/impact in the review and approval of drugs and biologics.”
  • “Expanded opportunities for medical science liaisons (MSLs) to help with clinical trials.”
  • “Participating in the launch of life saving medicines for undertreated patients.”

Most appealing aspects

What aspects of the role are most appealing?

Respondents listed several different aspects that are appealing. Flexibility was listed most often by 12.6% of the respondents. This was followed by work-life balance (9.47%) and autonomy (7.37%). One respondent from Florida stated they enjoyed the, “Schedule flexibility and work life balance.” A respondent from New Jersey added, “Autonomy to choose the tasks I will do, and in what order. I also like not being tied to a counter.” One additional respondent from Pennsylvania summed this up briefly when they stated, “Scientific and engaging thinking every day; intelligent scientists as coworkers; ability to make my own schedule; reward for hard work and contributions.”

Least appealing aspects

What aspects of the role are least appealing?

On the other side of the spectrum are the aspects of the role that are not appealing. There was no specific theme to the responses. One of the pharmacists from New Jersey indicated, “Not working directly with patients and providers.” Another from Pennsylvania added, “Quick turnaround deadlines that necessitate night and weekend work.” One respondent from Colorado indicated, “Like many roles, dealing with negative behaviors of people.”

Advice

What advice should student pharmacists and practitioners consider when selecting a position in the pharmaceutical industry?

Respondents provided advice across several areas. Communication was listed by 8.42% of the pharmacists. A respondent from California stated, “Communication skills and being detail-oriented are essential as you will be liaising with colleagues from varying backgrounds and health authorities such as the Food and Drug Administration.” One respondent from Florida commented, “Get clinical experience first. You will be more valuable within a medical affairs organization if you understand the challenges and barriers providers face in a clinical setting.” Another from North Carolina added, “The opportunities in the industry are endless, but you have to work for them they will not just be handed to you.”

The following list provides a partial sample of the open-ended comments from participants.

  • “Pharmaceutical industry is a great way to broaden your knowledge beyond the scope of a pharmacist.”
  • “Develop communication skills in addition to hard skills.”
  • “Network, network, network.”
  • “Leadership skills are necessary.”
  • “Be open to many options.”

Critical factor ratings

Opportunities for advancement
[To what degree does your work allow for advancement?]

Respondents rated the opportunities for advancement in the pharmaceutical industry as the highest rated critical factor at 8.45. This reinforces the opportunities that pharmacists have to continue to advance in the industry.

A pharmacist from Illinois stated, “I've been offered several growth opportunities over the years in medical affairs.” Another from Virginia added, “Working (my) way up in leadership in clinical groups or transitioning into many different areas of production/research.” A pharmacist from New Jersey indicated that there is “No ceiling to growth: knowledge base, and salary.”

8.45
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0 = Little advancement opportunities 10 = Great opportunities for advancement

Leadership development/professional involvement
[To what extent does your work allow for the development of leadership skills and professional involvement in the pharmacy profession?]

Respondents rated leadership development/professional involvement as a high-range 8.13.

One respondent from Virginia highlighted this area, saying, “Continuing education and mentorship available (may not be pharmacy profession-specific, but professional development specific).”

Another from Texas indicated, “Leadership–extensive opportunity to practice and develop direct/matrix leadership skills.”

A respondent from Missouri provided a broader look at this factor and added, “I am able to teach, be on a Board of a hospital, and get involved in lots of industry leadership positions like the American Pharmacists Association (APhA), Council on Radionuclides and Radiopharmaceuticals (CORAR), Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (SNMMI) SNMMI, state associations, United States Pharmacopeia (USP), and Board of Pharmacy Specialties (BPS).”

8.13
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0 = Little development of leadership skills and professional involvement 10 = Great opportunities for leadership development and professional involvement

Community impact
[How much impact does your work have in terms of serving the community?]

Respondents rated this factor in the mid-range with a rating of 7.55.

A respondent from Colorado stated, “My current work empowers pharmacies/pharmacists to activate their provider status which we know increases the positive impact on the health of our communities. National provider status is needed to bring that score up even higher.” Another from New Jersey had a role specific comment, saying, “I work for the Foundation where we provide eligible patients that qualify with free medicine.”

A different pharmacist from New Jersey looked at the impact and stated they provide a “Service to community is via health care provider (HCP) education.”

7.55
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0 = Little impact 10 = High level of impact

Autonomy
[To what extent does your work allow for autonomy in decision making?]

Respondents rated this factor in the mid-range with a 7.81 response.

A respondent from North Carolina indicated that they have “A high level of autonomy although it is checked/reviewed by those above me.” Another from Mississippi had a specific position comment, saying, “In my MSL role, how I go about doing my job has a lot of autonomy but what we are allowed to say and not say does not allow for much autonomy in decision making.”

A pharmacists from Pennsylvania simply stated, "Transparency".

7.81
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0 = Very little low autonomy 10 = High level of autonomy

Focus
[To what extent does your work allow you to be focused on the future versus a focus only on immediate tasks?]

Respondents rated the focus of their work mid-range with a rating of 7.27.

One respondent from Iowa commented, “My job is mostly focused on the future. Future opportunities in the pharmacy industry. How can we support it, drive it, innovate for it?” Another from New Jersey added, “My role, since a majority is focused on education and relationships, is truly a mix of both immediate and future. I have to review outcome reports to identify new and emerging educational needs that allow us to plan and seek out new ways of delivering education.”

Another respondent from Maryland added, “This comes with progression in the role (strategy work).”

7.27
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0 = Immediate tasks only 10 = Tasks focused on the future

Prestige
[To what extent does your work provide professional prestige?]

Pharmacists rated prestige in the mid-range with a rating of 7.56.

A respondent from New Jersey provided a detailed response, “This role, and my previous roles, have allowed me to develop a robust network of colleagues, both within the United States and the European Union that I look fondly upon. It gives me a great deal of satisfaction knowing that I am respected in the community. No residency, no fellowship, and yet, I am precepting student pharmacists and fellows for the future. If you asked me when I graduated pharmacy school where I would be now, I would have never dreamed this!”

A respondent from Missouri had a different perspective when they added, “There isn't much recognition of me being a pharmacist.”

7.56
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0 = Provides low prestige 10 = Provides high prestige

Creating value/positive outcomes
[To what extent does your work allow for personal fulfillment through the creation of value and positive outcomes?]

Pharmacists rated this factor at 8.19, an upper-range response.

A respondent from Iowa stated, “I love the ability to interact with pharmacists and see how they are working in their communities. This is very fulfilling and valuable.” Another from Florida indicated that “The fulfillment I get from my work comes from understanding that I am able to effect change in many patients at once rather than individually in clinic. I am a part of a whole, with a mission to create a better medical environment for patients to receive appropriate care which makes me feel that I am a valuable member of the medical community.”

8.19
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0 = Little extent 10 = High extent

Patient relationships
[To what degree do you have ongoing or long-term relationships with patients?]

Respondents rated patient relationships as the lowest rated factor (tied with patient interactions) at 0.84.

A pharmacist from New Jersey summed up what most stated, saying, “Direct patient engagement is limited to specific roles or circumstances; it does not involve direct patient care.”

0.84
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0 = No ongoing/ long-term relationships 10 = All are long-term relationships

Coworker/client relationships
[To what degree do you have ongoing or long-term relationships with coworkers or clients?]

This factor is rated the second highest by this group at a high range with a score of 8.32.

A respondent from North Carolina stated, “Because of my 45 years of experience in the industry, coworkers look to me for some thoughts on our work.” Another from Missouri added, “There is almost no patient contact unless I am getting patient speakers for events. I have so many professional contacts as that is a third of my job.”

8.32
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0 = No ongoing/ long-term relationships 10 = All are long-term relationships

Writing/conducting research
[How often do you engage in writing and/or conducting research?]

Respondents are mid-range with a rating of 5.21.

A respondent from New Jersey indicated, “Only as related to the program we manage.” Another from Pennsylvania added, “Research and writing are the backbone of medical communications, and they are VERY important skills to have.”

5.21
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0 = None of my time 10 = All my time

Generating new ideas
[To what degree does your work involve generating new ideas?]

Pharmacists in the industry rated generating new ideas in the mid-range with a rating of 7.88.

A respondent from Pennsylvania stated that, “Innovative thinking is required for immediate tasks and projects.” Another respondent from Florida added, “I encourage my team often to think outside of the box when facing a challenge in order to create an environment of innovation and creativity.” One additional pharmacist from Missouri indicated, “There is a lot of strategy involved.”

7.88
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0 = Little innovative thinking 10 = High degree of innovative thinking

Supervision/management
[To what extent do you spend your time organizing, managing, or supervising others and/or business operations?]

Respondents rated this critical factor at a mid-range score of 5.77.

A comment was provided by a respondent from Missouri, “This is most of what I do. I have people reporting to me all throughout the United States, France, and Slovakia.” Another respondent from Maryland has a different perspective, “We have an operations team who manages timelines and budget.”

5.77
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0 = None of my time 10 = All my time

Patient interaction
[How much time do you spend interacting with patients?]

Patient interaction was tied with patient relationships as the lowest critical factors for this group at 0.84.

One respondent from Missouri stated, “I do not spend much time on public or patients. Usually, 100% with coworkers and health care providers.” A respondent from Florida looked at this differently even though this was rated as a low factor they added, “At the end of the day, when you go to sleep at night, the patients and their well-being is what matters the most and is why we decided to be pharmacists.”

0.84
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0 = None of my time 10 = All my time

Public interaction
[How much time do you spend interacting with the public?]

Respondents rated public interaction as the low range with a rating of 3.05.

One respondent from Maryland stated, “I mostly interact with coworkers and physician investigators.” Another from Florida had a different thought about this, “The benefits of this continue even beyond the current role and position within an organization. Networking is something that builds lifelong success.”

3.05
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0 = None of my time 10 = All my time

Collaboration
[How often do you work or collaborate with other health professionals or educate other professionals in your work?]

Respondents rated this factor in the mid-range with a rating of 7.58.

One pharmacist from New Jersey indicated, “100% of my job description.” Another from Maryland stated, “We work in an interdisciplinary team.” A respondent from Indiana added, “Constantly working with physicians, nurses, and some pharmacists.”

7.58
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0 = None of my time 10 = All my time

Family/leisure time
[How much free time do you have for leisure and family activities in your work?]

Pharmacists rated family/leisure time at the mid-range with a rating of 6.72.

A pharmacist from Iowa stated, “I have good work-life balance. Any issues I have are typically self-inflicted as I need to be better at establishing ‘work hours.’” Another respondent from New Jersey added, “My current company really respects that. They host events for our families and cover the costs.” A respondent from Mississippi agreed with the above statements, saying, “Biggest perk of my job is work-life balance!”

6.72
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0 = Little free time 10 = Plenty of time for family and leisure activities

Impact on well-being
[To what degree do you impact the well-being of individuals?]

Respondents rated their impact on well-being in the mid-range with a score of 7.79.

One respondent from North Carolina stated, “If my work is not done accurately and properly people's lives can be negatively affected.” Another from New Jersey added, “Health care provider education impacts quality of care.”

7.79
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0 = Low degree 10 = High degree

Problem solving
[To what degree do you solve problems with tried-and-true alternatives versus untested alternatives in your work?]

Respondents rated problem solving as a mid-range factor with a score of 5.15.

A pharmacist from Indiana indicated, “If an easy fix exists, I made sure we used it. If we needed a new solution, we used brainstorming methods and Six Sigma to apply changes to business processes when truly needed.” Another from Missouri added, “Everything is literature based, but if answers were known, we would not have asked them. It is a balanced mix.”

5.15
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0 = Tried and true 10 = Untested alternatives

Expertise
[How general or specialized is the expertise required in your work?]

Respondents rated expertise in the mid-range with a rating of 7.61.

One respondent from Illinois stated that one needs a “Strong focus on injectables, parenteral nutrition, and pharmacy automation/devices.” Another from Indiana indicated, “You have to understand clinical health care to do the work I did, as well as good manufacturing (GMP) practices. But I had to learn many disease state details on a project-by-project basis, so there was continual learning which I very much enjoyed.”

7.61
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0 = Generalized 10 = Specialized

Repetition
[To what degree is your work composed of activities and tasks that are highly repetitive versus highly variable?]

Respondents rated repetition a mid-range score of 5.90.

One respondent from Missouri stated, “Each day is different, but the process is the same.” Another from New Jersey added, “Very (repetitive). We monitor the program, and issue out reports to our donor companies.”

5.90
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0 = Highly repetitive 10 = Highly variable

Applying scientific knowledge
[How much of your time is spent applying scientific knowledge in your work?]

Respondents rated the application of scientific knowledge at the mid-range with a rating of 7.54.

One respondent from North Carolina stated, “The medical safety of people is at risk if I do my job properly. Understanding the science of the work is essential.” One respondent from Missouri looked at both of the scientific and clinical side and added, “Strategy is all scientific and clinical.”

7.54
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0 = No application 10 = High level of application all the time

Applying clinical knowledge
[How much of your time is spent applying clinical knowledge in your work?]

Respondents rated application of clinical knowledge at a mid-range with a score of 6.71, slightly lower than the application of scientific knowledge.

A respondent from New Jersey stated, “Ensure our products are being properly used and appropriate information is shared with the community.”

6.71
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0 = No application 10 = High level of application all the time

Parental leave
[To what extent does your work setting offer parental leave opportunities?]

Respondents rated parental leave at a mid-range rating of 7.26. It should be noted that several respondents did comment that this does not apply to them.

A respondent from North Carolina indicated, “I got pregnant (oops) when I had been with the company for only 2 months. Fully paid maternity leave and my European Union-based boss APOLOGIZED that I only got 3 months paid.”

Another respondent from Florida added, “Paternal leave is similar to maternity leave which is something that I find odd. It should be that the mother is afforded longer time away to be with the child, and this is not the case for many organizations in the United States.”

7.26
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0 = Limited opportunities 10 = Unlimited opportunities

Compensation
[To what degree do you feel compensated for your responsibilities in your work?]

Compensation was rated as the high range with a rating of 8.19.

A respondent from Missouri put it simply, saying, “I feel compensated adequately.” Another from Indiana feels good about compensation and added, “I don’t deserve what they offer me, very generous.” Overall, the comments on compensation were very positive by the respondents regardless of their role and company.

8.19
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0 = Not well compensated 10 = Well compensated

Benefit package
[How comprehensive is the employee benefit package offered in your work setting?]

Respondents rated the overall benefit package the same as their compensation with a rating of 8.19.

A respondent from New Jersey put this simply, saying, “Excellent benefits.” Another from North Carolina listed the following: “Health insurance, health benefits, peloton bike, massage chairs at office. Amazing!”

8.19
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0 = Not comprehensive 10 = Very Comprehensive

Advice for students

Respondents provided advice across several areas and what the future brings. No specific trend came across in the comments from these pharmacists. Information from several of the industry pharmacists is listed below:

  • “New treatment modalities and new concepts for application of basic clinical pharmacology principles.”
  • “Commit to being a lifelong learner.”
  • “More education (PhD) opens many doors!”
  • “A lot of change. Concern with job security given politics.”
  • “Don't be afraid of statistics and other hard things. Strive to gather skills that make you more marketable than the next person.”
  • “Expansion of reimbursable services.”

Critical factors

Opportunities for advancement 8.45
Leadership development/professional involvement 8.13
Community impact 7.55
Autonomy 7.81
Focus 7.27
Prestige 7.56
Creating value/positive outcomes 8.19
Patient relationships 0.84
Coworker/client relationships 8.32
Writing/conducting research 5.21
Generating new ideas 7.88
Supervision/management 5.77
Patient interaction 0.84
Public interaction 3.05
Collaboration 7.58
Family/leisure time 6.72
Impact on well-being 7.79
Problem solving 5.15
Expertise 7.61
Repetition 5.90
Applying scientific knowledge 7.54
Applying clinical knowledge 6.71
Parental leave 7.26
Compensation 8.19
Benefit package 8.19

References/resources

Schommer JC, Sogol EM, Brown LM. Work profile factors identified from the career pathway evaluation program, 2018 pharmacist profile survey. Am J Pharm. 2019;83(10):7480.

Industry pharmacist salary. ZipRecruiter. Available at: www.ziprecruiter.com/Salaries/Industry-Pharmacist-Salary Accessed July 1, 2025.

Professional organizations

Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy (AMCP)

675 North Washington Street, Suite 220, Alexandria, VA 22314
(703) 684-2600 | www.amcp.org

Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE)

190 South LaSalle Street, Suite 3000, Chicago, IL 60603-3446
(312) 664-3575 | www.acpe-accredit.org

American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy (AACP)

1400 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202
(703) 739-2330 | www.aacp.org

American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists (AAPS)

Avedisian Hall, 7 Greenhouse Road, Kingston, RI 02881
(703) 556-0650 | www.aaps.org

American Association of Psychiatric Pharmacists (AAPP)

8055 O Street, Suite S113, Lincoln, NE 68510
(402) 476-1677 | www.aapp.org

American College of Apothecaries (ACA)

2830 Summer Oaks Drive, Bartlett, TN 38134
(901) 383-8119 | www.acainfo.org

American College of Clinical Pharmacy (ACCP)

13000 West 87th Street Parkway, Lenexa, KS 66215-4530
(913) 492-3311 | www.accp.com

American Foundation for Pharmaceutical Education (AFPE)

11325 Random Hills Road, Suite 360A-105, Fairfax, VA 22030
(571) 404-0471 | www.afpenet.org

American Pharmacists Association (APhA)

2215 Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20037
(202) 628-4410 | www.pharmacist.com

American Society of Consultant Pharmacists (ASCP)

1240 North Pitt Street, Suite 300, Alexandria, VA 22314
(703) 739-1300 | www.ascp.com

American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP)

4500 East-West Highway, Suite 900, Bethesda, MD 20814
(866) 279-0681 | www.ashp.org

Board of Pharmacy Specialties (BPS)

2215 Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20037
(202) 946-5026 | www.bpsweb.org

Hematology/Oncology Pharmacy Association (HOPA)

555 East Wells Street, Suite 1100, Milwaukee, WI 53202
(877) 467-2791 | www.hoparx.org

National Alliance of State Pharmacy Associations (NASPA)

2530 Professional Road, North Chesterfield, VA 23235
(804) 285-4431 | www.naspa.us

National Association of Boards of Pharmacy (NABP)

1600 Feehanville Drive, Mount Prospect, IL 60056
(847) 391-4406 | www.nabp.pharmacy

National Association of Chain Drug Stores (NACDS)

1776 Wilson Blvd, Suite 200, Arlington, VA 22209
(703) 549-3001 | www.nacds.org

National Association of Specialty Pharmacy (NASP)

300 New Jersey Ave, NW, #900, Washington, DC 20001
(703) 842.0122 | www.naspnet.org

National Community Pharmacists Association (NCPA)

100 Daingerfield Road, Alexandria, VA 22314
(703) 683-8200 | www.ncpa.org

National Pharmaceutical Association (NPhA)

10810 North Tatum Boulevard, Suite 102-965, Phoenix, AZ 85028
(480) 405-9291 | www.nationalpharmaceuticalassociation.org

Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA)

670 Maine Avenue, SW, Suite 1000, Washington, DC 20024
(202) 835-3400 | www.phrma.org

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
ADVERTISEMENT